Paradoxes and irrationality in economics


  1. The Paradox of Thrift: When individuals try to save more during an economic downturn, it actually reduces overall demand, slowing economic recovery and potentially worsening the downturn. While saving is rational for individuals, it’s irrational at the collective level during a recession.

  2. The Allais Paradox: This demonstrates that people’s choices violate expected utility theory. Even when outcomes have clear probabilities and values, people often choose options that don’t maximize their expected utility, highlighting irrational behavior in decision-making.

  3. The Endowment Effect: People tend to overvalue things they own, even if they acquired them very recently. For example, a person who just received a coffee mug might demand a higher price to sell it than they would be willing to pay to buy an identical mug, showing irrational attachment to possessions.

  4. Giffen Goods Paradox: For certain inferior goods, demand increases as the price rises, which is counterintuitive. This paradox was first observed in the context of staple foods like bread or rice, where a higher price might force people to consume even more because they can’t afford pricier substitutes.

  5. The Money Illusion: People often think in nominal rather than real terms, ignoring inflation. For example, people may feel wealthier with a nominal wage increase, even if inflation means their purchasing power remains the same or even decreases, leading to irrational financial decisions.

  6. Paradox of Choice: While having choices is generally positive, too many options can lead to decision fatigue, dissatisfaction, and irrational decision-making. In markets with abundant options, consumers might struggle to make rational choices or feel less satisfied with their selections.

  7. Sunk Cost Fallacy: This occurs when people continue investing in something because of the resources they’ve already put into it, even when it’s no longer rational to do so. Economically, future decisions should only consider future costs and benefits, not past investments, but people often act irrationally here.

  8. Time Inconsistency and Hyperbolic Discounting: People often prefer smaller, immediate rewards over larger, delayed ones, even if waiting is more rational. This explains behaviors like procrastination and impulsive spending, where short-term desires override long-term goals.

  9. The Free-Rider Problem: In public goods and services, individuals can benefit without directly paying for them, leading to under-provision. It’s rational for individuals to avoid contributing, but if everyone acts this way, society suffers from a lack of resources for shared services.

  10. Loss Aversion and Prospect Theory: People fear losses more than they value equivalent gains, which leads to risk-averse behavior even in situations where taking a calculated risk might be more beneficial. This explains why investors sometimes avoid risk even when it would yield a better payoff.

  11. The Prisoner’s Dilemma in Economics: This classic paradox shows that individuals acting in their own self-interest can end up worse off than if they had cooperated. In business, this might mean companies in a price war that erodes profits for all, rather than maintaining stable, profitable prices.

  12. The Paradox of Value (Diamond-Water Paradox): Despite water being essential for life, it’s much cheaper than diamonds, which are largely non-essential. This paradox questions why non-essential, luxury items are valued higher than essentials and examines the irrational ways we assign value.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pobreza como Escolha: O Paradoxo Cultural Português vs. a Mentalidade Israelita

Image
Portugal, um país rico em história e cultura, parece por vezes abraçar uma mentalidade que desafia a lógica económica moderna. A frase "ser pobre é uma opção" ecoa uma realidade complexa na sociedade portuguesa, onde existe "um especial afecto e carinho pela pobreza", enquanto "a riqueza para nós é abjecta". Esta perspectiva, profundamente enraizada na cultura portuguesa, contrasta fortemente com a mentalidade israelita. Vejamos as diferenças: 1. Atitude face à riqueza:    - Portugal: Tendência para ver a riqueza com suspeita, às vezes associada a práticas menos éticas.    - Israel: A riqueza é frequentemente vista como resultado de trabalho árduo e inovação, sendo celebrada como um sinal de sucesso. 2. Empreendedorismo:    - Portugal: Muitas vezes hesitante em assumir riscos, com uma preferência por empregos estáveis.    - Israel: Conhecida como a "Startup Nation", abraça o risco e a inovação como caminhos para o sucesso. 3. Educação e carreira:...
Read more

Navigating the Illusions: A Critique of Liberal Optimism

In the tapestry of contemporary political thought, liberalism stands out for its unwavering optimism and its unshakable faith in human progress. As a philosophy that has shaped much of Western political and social landscape, liberalism carries with it the promise of a better future, one where freedom, equality, and rationality reign supreme. However, beneath this glossy veneer lies a series of assumptions that, upon closer inspection, reveal a framework not only flawed but potentially dangerous in its disregard for the complexities of human nature and the unpredictability of history. This essay aims to dissect these foundational myths of liberalism, challenging its proponents to confront the realities that it too often ignores. The Myth of Unending Progress Central to the liberal creed is the belief in progress - the notion that human societies are on an inexorable march toward betterment. This view not only presupposes a linear trajectory of history but also implies an inherent goodne...
Read more

"Far-Right" parties have nothing to to with the Right

Extreme right parties often position themselves as traditional conservatives or advocates of nationalist policies, but many political analysts argue that they are fundamentally populists rather than true right-wing conservatives. Here’s why: Populism Over Principles Anti-Establishment Rhetoric : Extreme right parties frequently employ a populist strategy of framing themselves as outsiders battling a corrupt elite. This approach transcends traditional left-right distinctions and focuses more on appealing to widespread dissatisfaction with the status quo. Economic Policies : Traditional right-wing policies emphasize free markets and fiscal conservatism. However, many extreme right parties advocate for protectionist economic measures and increased government intervention, which align more closely with populist economics than with classic right-wing principles. Identity Politics : Populism thrives on creating an “us vs. them” narrative. Extreme right parties often emphasize national identi...
Read more