Reasoning AI

for all those that are in denial about the ability to LLMs to reason, go through these points and check:


Determining whether someone truly understands what they're saying—whether it's a human or an AI like me—requires evaluating **depth, consistency, and contextual awareness**. Here’s how to assess understanding:


1. Depth of Explanation

 - Sign of Understanding: Ability to rephrase, elaborate, or provide examples in different ways. 

 - Red Flag: Parroting jargon without simplification or concrete applications. 

 - Example: 

 - ✅ Photosynthesis converts sunlight to energy—like a solar panel for plants. 

 - ❌ Photosynthesis is a metabolic process involving chlorophyll.


2. Logical Consistency

 - Sign of Understanding: Arguments hold up under scrutiny; no contradictions. 

 - Red Flag: Incoherent or shifting claims when questioned. 


3. Contextual Adaptation

 - Sign of Understanding: Adjusts explanations for the audience (e.g., child vs. expert). 

 - Red Flag: Rigid, one-size-fits-all responses. 

 - Example: 

 - ✅ To a kid: "Gravity is what makes things fall down!"

 - ✅ To a physicist: "Gravity is spacetime curvature governed by mass-energy."


4. Answering Follow-Up Questions 

 Sign of Understanding: Clarifies, corrects, or admits uncertainty. 

 - Red Flag: Deflecting or repeating the same phrase. 

 - Example: 

 - ✅ "I see why you’re confused—let me explain differently." 

 - ❌ "As I said before, it’s obvious."


5. Application to New Problems* 

 - Sign of Understanding: Uses knowledge creatively in unfamiliar scenarios. 

 - Red Flag: Only reciting memorized answers. 

 - Example: 

 - ✅ "If Rome fell later, medieval trade routes might’ve developed differently." 

 - ❌ "The Roman Empire fell in 476 AD." (No extrapolation.) 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pobreza como Escolha: O Paradoxo Cultural Português vs. a Mentalidade Israelita

Image
Portugal, um país rico em história e cultura, parece por vezes abraçar uma mentalidade que desafia a lógica económica moderna. A frase "ser pobre é uma opção" ecoa uma realidade complexa na sociedade portuguesa, onde existe "um especial afecto e carinho pela pobreza", enquanto "a riqueza para nós é abjecta". Esta perspectiva, profundamente enraizada na cultura portuguesa, contrasta fortemente com a mentalidade israelita. Vejamos as diferenças: 1. Atitude face à riqueza:    - Portugal: Tendência para ver a riqueza com suspeita, às vezes associada a práticas menos éticas.    - Israel: A riqueza é frequentemente vista como resultado de trabalho árduo e inovação, sendo celebrada como um sinal de sucesso. 2. Empreendedorismo:    - Portugal: Muitas vezes hesitante em assumir riscos, com uma preferência por empregos estáveis.    - Israel: Conhecida como a "Startup Nation", abraça o risco e a inovação como caminhos para o sucesso. 3. Educação e carreira:...
Read more

Navigating the Illusions: A Critique of Liberal Optimism

In the tapestry of contemporary political thought, liberalism stands out for its unwavering optimism and its unshakable faith in human progress. As a philosophy that has shaped much of Western political and social landscape, liberalism carries with it the promise of a better future, one where freedom, equality, and rationality reign supreme. However, beneath this glossy veneer lies a series of assumptions that, upon closer inspection, reveal a framework not only flawed but potentially dangerous in its disregard for the complexities of human nature and the unpredictability of history. This essay aims to dissect these foundational myths of liberalism, challenging its proponents to confront the realities that it too often ignores. The Myth of Unending Progress Central to the liberal creed is the belief in progress - the notion that human societies are on an inexorable march toward betterment. This view not only presupposes a linear trajectory of history but also implies an inherent goodne...
Read more

Emotions: A Hindrance in the Pursuit of Progress

  When you think about innovation or AI, emotions are rarely part of the equation. And frankly, they shouldn’t be. We live in an era where the pace of technological advancement is accelerating, and the biggest hurdles we face are often more human than technological. Emotions, while valuable in our personal lives, can act as a serious hindrance in the world of problem-solving and progress. Let’s break it down. The Emotional Trap Humans evolved emotions for survival—fear to avoid danger, joy to foster social bonds. But in today’s high-stakes environments, these same emotions often get in the way. Take decision-making, for example. Emotional biases, such as fear or attachment to a previous idea, can cloud our judgment, leading us to make suboptimal choices. We see this constantly in business and technology. Imagine an engineer overly attached to their design—ignoring data that suggests a different path is better. Or a leader paralyzed by fear of failure, slowing down progress for the ...
Read more